June Rogers

Fundraising Innovation: Solving the Artist Auction Dilemma

Posted by June Rogers, Jul 27, 2011 3 comments


June Rogers

June Rogers

It’s a cold snowy morning in Fairbanks, AK. Volunteer ushers are gathered in the lobby of Hering Auditorium, anticipating the arrival of 1300 students who will be attending a performance.

One of the volunteers, local artist Carol Hilgemann, knowing that I would be interested, brought a copy of an article dealing with considerations that art auctions create for artists. A lively discussion about the value of art auctions occupied the group until interrupted by the arrival of our audience.

Fairbanks Arts Association began the movement of the auctioning of art in our community – and the event was successful. Success begets success. Other organizations began to auction art at fundraisers. Art auctions were everywhere.

After reading the article and hearing Carol’s thoughts, I contacted other artists about their feelings on the subject. Reactions to auctions are as varied as there are artists. Some events are better at giving exposure to artists, but a good number of artists have told me they feel they’re making a poor decision when donating to an auction.

Many felt – even if they wanted to – they weren’t able to contribute to the dozens of requests received each year. Contributing items of lesser value or prints sometimes answered their dilemma – a pattern that was becoming obvious as we received more prints and less original artwork for FAA’s annual fundraiser. The auction then required more items and more administration to catalogue the items – a spiral that didn’t prove well for the artist or the event. It was time for a change.

Click! An idea!

A call to Alaska Bowl Company, explaining my idea of how to change our auction, resulted in a resounding yes – 25 wooden bowls were contributed and then given to artists with a request to make an art-piece that could be auctioned. The fundraising event would still have an art auction and the items would be originals by local artists, BUT the piece would not devalue the marketing of the artist’s regular work.

Artists outdid themselves. Bowls were carved, painted, quilted, cut, and reassembled. Each piece was unique and each was the work of sought-after-artists, whose works in galleries were not being devalued by sale of the auction piece. Quite the reverse – artists were being discovered by a new audience and their gallery sales were enhanced.

The idea, now in it’s 13th year, has continued successfully with each event featuring a different object: shoes, restaurant platters, books, hard hats, tote bags, and metal hardware cloth. The resulting artwork is a delightful surprise and the annual event is one our most popular fundraisers.

Contributing businesses receive extra benefit by hosting a pre-auction art exhibit one week prior to the fundraiser, where they receive public recognition of their participation. Many times a photo with an accompanying article has been on the front page of the newspaper or on the local evening news.

Artists are able to participate in a positive way to support an organization they believe in without sacrificing the sale of their studio inventory. Carol, who has participated in several of the “featured item” auctions, commented:

“Artists are in the unique position of being asked frequently to donate the product of their skill, knowledge and expertise to nonprofit organizations for fund raising events. This idea has eliminated the exploitation of an artist’s customary artwork being sold at bargain prices.”

Marketing artwork is challenging and a strong community of artists is not happenstance. Being aware that art sold at charity auctions depletes marketing possibilities at studios and galleries, Fairbanks Arts Association has committed to supporting a healthy arts community and has met the auction issue through an innovative approach.

3 responses for Fundraising Innovation: Solving the Artist Auction Dilemma

Comments

July 28, 2011 at 1:04 pm

Cudos to Fairbanks for at least considering this to be a problem. While for most of us the word auction brings to mind fantastic prices for precious works at Soothby's, for many it is more evocotive of bargain basement prices for above average items, a place to find things that might show up on The Antiques Road Show one day. In Washington, DC this dilemma is more pronounced because of the incredible breadth of non-profit organizations. We are the epicenter for well-intentioned groups who need to raise funds, and this geography spreads into the surrounding affluent communites in Maryland and Virginia. Many private schools, medical treatment centers, food banks, arts advocasy groups and of course arts organizations themselves regularly ask artists to contribute to their cause. Many of these groups want this as a free donation. I applaud the efforts to find another way to offer art items by way of giving artists objects with which to create, but we stiil find ourselves in the position of undervaluing the artists themselves. We simply do not ask bankers, doctors, lawyers, and merchants to give of their talents and services the way we ask artists. As long as there is a perception that art is a unique possession that can be gained cheaply and sold expensively we will not get away from using artists as we use no other skilled, talented and contributing member of our communities.

  • Please login to post comments.
June Rogers says
July 28, 2011 at 1:47 pm

Thank you for your response. Another solution to art auctions is an art sale by lottery, which I wrote about in another post to this week's Artsblog. As a footnote to that entry, I should point out that the artwork offered at the lottery sale is donated by person's who have already purchased the art from an artist or gallery.

I can't fully agree that we don't request as much of a contribution commitment from other professionals and business owners. Organizations regularly send dollar requests to lists of doctors, lawyers and other professionals that are thought to have discretionary incomes and businesses are sent more appeals for goods and services than many can afford to give. My husband and I are the owners of a small business that received 53 requests in the first month after we opened our doors. It was a "soft" opening meant to train our staff and we hadn't yet invited customers to a grand opening, however, the local charities all knew that we were there.

  • Please login to post comments.
July 28, 2013 at 12:45 am

As you say, requests are sent to professionals thought to have DISCRETIONARY INCOME. These donations are tax write-offs for the businesses, whereas artists are unable to claim a deduction, though for many of us, the retail value of the donation can represent several weeks of work. An organization I like to support requested work of at least a $2500 value this year. That's one fifth of my gross income as an emerging artist. That is not discretionary for me - that's grocery money.

  • Please login to post comments.