Chad Bauman

Are Subscriptions Dead? Maybe Not (Part 2)

Posted by Chad Bauman, Oct 05, 2011 2 comments


Chad Bauman

Chad Bauman

In Part 1, Chad discussed how Arena Stage conducted research to determine if subscriptions still worked for their organization. Below, and in Part 3, he discusses some of the tactical changes Arena Stage has made as a result of that work:

Simplified Pricing.
Our previous subscription pricing strategies were incredibly complicated. I remember spending hours poring over pricing strategy, and at the end thinking that one would have to be a CPA to understand how our pricing model worked. We decided that in order to create an effective value proposition, subscription pricing would have to be clear and easy to understand.

We worked for weeks to develop a simple pricing structure that could be messaged easily, such as "buy 6 plays, get 2 plays free." The new pricing structure allowed us to easily communicate a value proposition and to eliminate complicated order sheets, replacing them with order forms that could be filled out easily.

Clear, concise and transparent pricing was pivotal to effectively communicating the value of a subscription.

Introduction of Dynamic Pricing for Single Tickets.
In 2009, Arena Stage introduced dynamic pricing for single tickets, and we immediately started to see an unanticipated outcome. Due to our new subscription pricing structure and the introduction of dynamic pricing for single tickets, we were able to guarantee subscribers "the best seats in the house at the best prices."

Dynamic pricing eliminated last-minute discounting on premium tickets, and rewarded single ticket buyers with a lower price for better seats if they were willing to purchase earlier. In turn, our patrons soon started to understand that the earlier they purchased, the better "the deal" they received, with the ultimate deal being given to subscribers.

As we religiously track all customer service issues, we can say with full confidence two years later that dynamic pricing has not caused distress with our ticket buyers or donors, and in fact, from the moment we introduced dynamic pricing to current day, we have increased the number of single-ticket-buyer households by 84%.

Focus on Retention and Customer Service.
We were allocating too much resource on subscription acquisition, and not enough on subscription retention. We developed a "say yes to the customer" approach with our subscribers, thereby earning us "industry leader" marks on our most recent customer satisfaction survey conducted by Shugoll Research.

Year to year benchmarks for customer service have increased steadily as we focused on providing our subscribers the best experience possible. Given today's sad state of customer service at most establishments, we were determined that our customer service would be a competitive advantage. In addition, we allotted resources for special subscriber recognition efforts throughout the year, including a sneak preview of the upcoming season, complimentary artisan chocolates at specific performances, and subscriber-only events.

During the 2010-11 season, we introduced a concierge program for all new subscribers. Each new subscriber was assigned a personal concierge on staff, who was expected to make themselves available to answer questions, field requests, or be helpful in any way. Concierges were reactive to inbound inquiries, but were also expected to be proactive throughout the year, offering new subscribers recommendations on local restaurants, parking, interesting tidbits about upcoming productions, and the like.

By concentrating on customer service and retention, we were able to increase our overall subscription renewal rate by 13% over three fiscal years.

*This blog post also appears on www.arts-marketing.blogspot.com.

2 responses for Are Subscriptions Dead? Maybe Not (Part 2)

Comments

October 05, 2011 at 3:41 pm

Hi Chad -
Couldn't agree more that rewarding good customers is a smart move. Why should the last minute crowd get all the advantages?

Have you thought about finding those "connector" people who tend to be the social "directors" of their facebook groups? Many organizations we've talked to offer special "invite your friends" deals to make an arts event a winning choice for a social meetup.
New research by LaPlacaCohen -- Culture Track -- shows that people under 40 tend to be entertainment omnivores looking for something special in grazing groups. It's all on www.laplacacohen.com, check it out.
Cheers! Mary

  • Please login to post comments.
October 05, 2011 at 9:46 pm

Mary,

We actually have what we call "influencer night" at Arena Stage for each production. It is a private sneak preview exclusively for influencers--most of which are social media influencers (facebook group organizers, meetup group organizers, Twitter gurus, etc). Our Artistic Director welcomes them, gives them information on the show, a "how to spread the word" flyer, and then asks them NOT to turn off their cell phones, but to log-in and send out a Facebook update, Tweet, or status update. We specifically installed wifi throughout our new building in order to keep these people connected.

Shonali Burke, one of our social media influencers, blogged about her experience at one of the events for OKLAHOMA!: http://www.waxingunlyrical.com/2011/07/15/how-arena-stage-uses-initiator....

We are partnering with iStrategy Labs to grow these events in the future.

Chad

  • Please login to post comments.